How does PFA compare to RF in terms of duration?

Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) is known for its efficiency and speed in comparison to Radiofrequency (RF) ablation. PFA typically conducts the ablation process in a shorter duration due to its mechanism, which uses brief pulses of electric field rather than continuous energy delivery. This allows for rapid and effective cell death while minimizing the heat diffusion to surrounding tissues, allowing for faster treatments.

The fast pacing of PFA helps limit procedure times, making it an appealing option for certain procedures, especially in a clinical setting where time efficiency can enhance patient throughput. Therefore, indicating that the duration of PFA is shorter than that of RF is aligned with current findings in the field, showcasing PFA's advantage in terms of time and patient comfort during ablation procedures.